MSNBC Anchor: "Our Job" Is To "Control Exactly What People Think"-2/22

Left-Wing Front Groups Make Anti-Trump Money Untraceable-2/22

Democrat Maxine Waters Calls Trump Cabinet Picks: “A Bunch of Scumbags”-2/22

Report: China nearly finished building South China Sea structures to house missiles-2/22

Venezuelans Now On A Forced Starvation Diet — Thanks, Socialism-2/22

Pictured: Veteran LA cop who was shot dead by heavily-tattooed gangster who had been released early from jail (via Jerry Brown's program) and went on murderous rampage-2/21 Daily Mail, ... The heavily tattooed gang member has a history of serious crimes and police believe he was released on parole as recently as a week ago as part of a new scheme designed to cut incarceration rates. ...

Freed to kill in a sanctuary city: Illegal immigrant gangster 'robbed then murdered man at rail station' weeks after being released in Denver despite request from ICE to keep him jailed for deportation-2/22

"It Looks Like A War Zone": Trump Vindicated After Violent Riot Erupts In Swedish Suburb-2/21

Drudge Put It Perfectly: Congressional Republicans Flail and Fail-2/21 Incompetence hinders party from accomplishing Trump’s agenda

Who Really Rules The United States?-2/19

Obama-linked activists have a ‘training manual’ for protesting Trump-2/19 America is under attack from within. Editor

Obama Should Be "Held Accountable" For The "Soft Coup" Against Trump-2/19 In his final days, he gave the NSA broad powers.

The Shadow Government's Destruction Of Democracy-2/19

Reporting? Liberal Media Have Much More in Mind Than That-2/21

Zero Percent Down Australian Loans In A Raging Bubble: Didn’t We Try This Before?-2/21

Nestle Joins Thousands Of Companies Leaving California Over Anti-Capitalist Lawmakers and Activists-2/20

Trump administration poised to change transgender student bathroom guidelines-2/22

The moment Harrison Ford came TERRIFYINGLY close to an air disaster: New video shows his plane passing just feet over a 737 with 106 people aboard as he misses runway and lands on taxiway-2/22

HAS PUTIN DETONATED NUKE? US sends specialist ‘nuke sniffer’ plane to the UK as ‘radiation spike’ sparks fears Putin has tested nuclear weapon in the Arctic-2/21

Trump Will Issue Executive Orders To Dismantle Obama’s ‘Climate Action Plan’-2/21

 A Climate Scientist Is Smeared for Blowing the Whistle on ‘Corrected’ Data-2/19

How can we trust global warming scientists if they keep twisting the truth-2/19

Load of bollocks: 2016 allegedly ‘hottest year’ by unmeasureable 1/100 of a degree – While satellites show ‘pause’ continues-2/19

A Spell to Bind Donald Trump and All Those Who Abet Him: February 24th Mass Ritual-2/20 Even darker forces may be getting into the act. Something to consider counteracting. Editor


President Trump and the Future of America-2/19 Vedic Astrology. She uses America's conceptual chart not the birth chart which is the time of Washington's inauguration. So it could be a little off regarding America. Editor

Fiery Thoughts ...

El Morya:

 

Each era chooses its new, corresponding Teaching, when all previous Teachings have become distorted. People tend to cling to these twisted distortions of the faith of their forefathers, yet no new Teaching ever excludes preceding ones. Little attention is paid to this fact, for the followers of every Teaching like to build their success on denial of the previous Teachings. But it is easy to prove the continuity of what people call religion. In this continuity is sensed a single stream of one energy. Calling it psychic [fiery] energy, we speak of the Sophia of the Hellenic world or Sarasvati of the Hindus. The Holy Ghost of the Christians manifests signs of psychic energy, just as do the creative Adonai of Israel, and Mithra of Persia, full of solar power. Certainly, no one doubts that the Fire of Zoroaster is the Fire of Space, which you now study. Agni Yoga, #416, 1929, Agni Yoga Society

 

 

Links
News
AIM
American Thinker
The Blaze
Breitbart
City Journal
CNS
Daily Caller
Drudge
Economist
Epoch Times
Financial Times
The Five
Fox News
Front Page
Gateway Pundit
Heritage Foundation
Human Events
Judicial Watch
LA Times
Liberty Mill
Lucianne
NewsBusters
NewsMax
NY Times
Pajamas Media
Real Clear Politics
Strategy Page
Townhall
UK Daily Mail
UK Telegraph
Wall Street Journal
Washington Examiner
Wash. Free Beacon
Washington Times
World Net Daily
World Tribune
Zero Hedge
Gertz File
Victor Davis Hanson
J. R. Nyquist
Jim Sinclair
Thomas Sowell
Mark Steyn
NRO
Spirit, Eclectic, etc ...
Anomalist
Ascended Master Teachings
Beachcombing
Blavatsky News
Buddhist Channel
Buddhist Door
Coast to Coast
Guru Rinpoche
Daily Grail
Digital Tibetan Altar
Fortean Times
in5d
i09
IONS
Juicy Living Tour
Natural News
New Dawn Mag
Mystics of the Church
New Books at Amazon
Phayul
Religion And Spirituality
Religion at Huff. Post
Spirit Daily
Spirit Science
TCHRD
Tibet Net
Unexplained Mysteries
View Zone
Science & Archaeology
Ancient History Encyclopedia
Archaeologica
Frontiers of Anthropology
Global Warming 101
Live Science
Morien Institute News
New Scientist
Past Horizons
PhysOrg
Science AGoGo
Science Daily
Science@NASA
Scientific American
Space.com
SpaceWeather
Terra
Accuweather
Climate Depot
Disaster Updates
EarthChangesTV
National Geographic
Nature
NOAA
Satellite Discoveries
U.S. Weather Map
World Seismic USGS Map
Misc.
Art Daily
Arts and Letters
BibliOdyssey
Bleacher Report
Boing Boing
Book TV C-Span2
CEO Express
Congressional Reports
Contact Your Congressman
Gold & Silver Prices
Gov't Info Awareness
GovTrack.us
Hoax—Slayer
Legal Resources
Maps Google
Mapquest
Project Gutenberg
Public Domain Review
Reference Desk
Rotten Tomatoes
So You Wanna
US Gov. Search
Wiktionary
Wikipedia
Wired
You Tube

The Statue of Liberty Has Nothing to Do with Immigration-2/1 Rush Limbaugh, RUSH: It happens every time I reveal what to me is common information. I check the email, and there were a bunch of people that were shocked to learn the Statue of Liberty wasn’t about immigration. It shows you how successful left-wing-created narratives have been. Let me tell you the truth about this, as abbreviated as I can with the lack of time I’ve got. The Statue of Liberty represents Libertas, Roman goddess of Liberty. She bears a torch liberty. She bears a torch and a tabula ansata. It’s a tabula that evokes the law on which is inscribed the date of the American Declaration of Independence. That’s what words are on the Statue of Liberty, words that commemorate July 4th, 1776. A broken chain lies at the feet of the Statue of Liberty. The Statue of Liberty had absolutely nothing to do with immigration. So why do people think that it does? Well, there was a socialist poet. (Are poets anything other than socialists and communists?) Her name was Emma Lazarus, and her poem was called The New Colossus, and it included the lines, “Give me your tired, give me your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.” That was not part of the creation of the Statue of Liberty. It was not delivered with the Statue of Liberty. It came later. The poem written by Emma Lazarus was written to help raise money for the statue’s pedestal. We had to build the pedestal, which is also a room underneath the statue. A bronze tablet bearing the Emma Lazarus poem was only put inside the pedestal in 1903. And yet there’s Lester Holt out there on NBC holding out the Statue of Liberty as a beacon to immigrants as so that’s what it was intended to be, fighting against Trump’s executive order of the weekend. They have nothing to do with immigration. Zilch. ...

Why Saint Thomas Aquinas Opposed Open Borders-1/31 Breitbart, by Thomas D. Williams -- Every nation has the right to distinguish, by country of origin, who can migrate to it and apply appropriate immigration policies, according to the great medieval scholar and saint Thomas Aquinas. In a surprisingly contemporary passage of his Summa Theologica, Aquinas noted that the Jewish people of Old Testament times did not admit visitors from all nations equally, since those peoples closer to them were more quickly integrated into the population than those who were not as close. Some antagonistic peoples were not admitted at all into Israel due to their hostility toward the Jewish people. The Law “prescribed in respect of certain nations that had close relations with the Jews,” the scholar noted, such as the Egyptians and the Idumeans, “that they should be admitted to the fellowship of the people after the third generation.” Citizens of other nations “with whom their relations had been hostile,” such as the Ammonites and Moabites, “were never to be admitted to citizenship.” “The Amalekites, who were yet more hostile to them, and had no fellowship of kindred with them, were to be held as foes in perpetuity,” Aquinas observed. For the scholar, it seemed sensible to treat nations differently, depending on the affinity of their cultures with that of Israel as well as their historic relations with the Jewish people. In his remarkably nuanced commentary, Aquinas also distinguished among three types of immigrants in the Israel of the Old Testament. First were “the foreigners who passed through their land as travelers,” much like modern day visitors with a travel visa. Second were those who “came to dwell in their land as newcomers,” seemingly corresponding to resident aliens, perhaps with a green card, living in the land but not with the full benefits of citizenship. A third case involved those foreigners who wished “to be admitted entirely to their fellowship and mode of worship.” Even here, dealing with those who wished to integrate fully into the life and worship of Israel required a certain order, Aquinas observed. “For they were not at once admitted to citizenship: just as it was law with some nations that no one was deemed a citizen except after two or three generations.” “The reason for this was that if foreigners were allowed to meddle with the affairs of a nation as soon as they settled down in its midst,” Aquinas logically reasoned, “many dangers might occur, since the foreigners not yet having the common good firmly at heart might attempt something hurtful to the people.” In other words, Aquinas taught that total integration of immigrants into the life, language, customs and culture (including worship, in this case) was necessary for full citizenship. It requires time for someone to learn which issues affect the nation and to make them their own, Aquinas argued. Those who know the history of their nation and have lived in it, working for the common good, are best suited to participate in decision-making about its future. It would be dangerous and unjust to place the future of a nation in the hands of recent arrivals who do not fully understand the needs and concerns of their adoptive home. ...

Editor, My Two Cents:
Did Immigrants Really Make this Country Great?
You hear that a lot these days especially from liberals. It's only partially true. From the Yukon to Tierra del Fuego and all countires in between, every single one of them was built by immigrants. Are any of them great like the United States? Certainly not Cuba and Venezuala. Canada is a very nice country, but great? I don't know that it is, not like America anyway. No other country measures up. Why not, they're all founded by immigrants. So it has to be something else. I think we all know what that is. It's the traditions this country was built on from Francis Bacon to Hobbes, Locke, Adam Smith and others. Then there is the Founding Fathers and the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. This is the framework that made us great. But then this is something progressive liberals will never understand since their goal is to change the Constitution.
Here's the second circumstance that made this country great. Every so often God assembles souls to reincarnate in certain countries at various time periods throughout history to lift up a planet. Call them advanced souls, old souls, lightbearers, sons and daughters of god, cultural creatives; you get the idea. Starting in the 1600's it was America's turn to make a difference.
Immigrants end up #3 on my list for what made America great.

Archaeologists Might Have Found Another Dead Sea Scroll Cave-2/9 Smithsonian, By Lauren Young -- It could be cave number 12 -- In the late 1940s, teenagers explored a cave hidden in the flanks of jagged hills of Wadi Qumran in the Judean Desert. Inside, they discovered fragments of the original Dead Sea Scrolls—ancient collections of text that contain the oldest-known biblical manuscripts. Since then, archaeologists have found 11 Qumran caves that they have extensively excavated in search of the precious scrolls that date back more than 2,000 years ago. Now, a team of archaeologists from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Liberty University in Virginia have discovered what they believe to be a 12th cave on the cliffs west of Qumran.
The Hebrew University press release writes that in the first wide-scale survey in the area since 1993, the team unearthed storage jars and lids from the Second Temple period (dating from 530 BC to 70 CE) in the cave that some scholars are already calling number 12. They also found a pair of iron pickaxe heads that they identified as being from the 1950s, suggesting the cave had been looted. Oren Gutfeld, an archaeologist at Hebrew University who was part of the dig, says he is confident that the newly discovered cave once contained Dead Sea Scrolls. “Although at the end of the day no scroll was found, and instead we ‘only’ found a piece of parchment rolled up in a jug that was being processed for writing, the findings indicate beyond any doubt that the cave contained scrolls that were stolen,” he says in the release. ...


The Selden Map. Credit: University of Oxford

Scientists unlock secrets of oldest surviving global trade map-2/9 PhysOrg, The origins and secrets of the 17th Century 'Selden Map of China' – the world's oldest surviving merchant map – have been revealed by scientists using state-of-the-art imaging techniques. Research led by Nottingham Trent University, in collaboration with the Science Section of the Victoria and Albert Museum, has for the first time been able to identify everything from the materials and techniques used, to the mistakes and re-drawings made by the cartographer. The scientists, writing in the journal Heritage Science, even propose a new location for the map's creation based on their evidence. The 1.6 x 1m map – which depicts ancient maritime trade routes in Asia – is thought to have been made between 1607-1619 and is painted with watercolours and ink on Chinese paper. It is a unique example of Chinese merchant cartography, showing a network of shipping routes with compass directions starting from the port of Quanzhou, Fujian province, and reaching as far as Japan and India. Very little is known about the origin of the Chinese-style map, which arrived at the Bodleian Library at the University of Oxford in 1659 – having been donated by prominent London lawyer John Selden – where it remained until its 'rediscovery' in 2008. In his will, Selden stated it was 'a map of China made there fairly' and that it had been taken by an English commander. The map was examined in-situ and non-invasively using a remote 'multispectral' imaging system developed at Nottingham Trent University. The system enabled the scientists to view areas of the map using different wavelengths of light – revealing the composition and make-up of materials used, as well as hidden details not visible to the naked eye. A range of complementary analytical techniques were used to identify the materials. The researchers found the binding medium used for the map was gum Arabic, a gum made from the sap of the acacia tree – typically used by European, south and west Asians – and not animal glue, which was almost always used in Chinese paintings at the time. ...

Mysterious Amazonian Geoglyphs Were Built in Already-Altered Forests-2/9 Live Science, By Stephanie Pappas -- Enormous geometrical earthworks found in the Amazon rainforest were built after humans had already begun altering the forest ecology, but the purpose of these huge ditches remains mysterious, according to new research. The geoglyphs — trenches as big as 36 feet (11 meters) wide and 13 feet (4 m) deep — were dug at various times between the first and 15th centuries. The geoglyphs were discovered in the 1980s, when deforestation for cattle ranching and other agricultural purposes exposed the earthworks, said Jenny Watling, an archaeologist at the University of São Paulo in Brazil, who led the research while she was a doctoral candidate at the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom. The question, Watling told Live Science, was how the landscape looked when the geoglyphs were built. "There's been a very big debate circling for decades now about how pristine or man-made the Amazonian forests are," Watling said. The new study suggests that humans have been altering these forests for about 4,000 years.

 

Democrats’ Real Global Warming Fraud Revealed-2/19 American Thinker, By Dennis T. Avery -- The Democrats are devastated by their recent lost elections. They will be even more devastated as we learn the details of their massive global warming fraud. Dr. John Bates, a former high level NOAA scientist, set off a furor by revealing that a recent NOAA paper, which claimed global warming hadn’t “paused” during the past 20 years, was fraudulent. The paper was timed to undergird Obama’s signing of the hugely expensive Paris climate agreement. This is only a tiny fraction of the climate fraud. Fortunately, high-tech research has finally sorted out the “mystery factor” in our recent climate changes—and it’s mostly not CO2. Even redoubling carbon dioxide, by itself, would raise earth’s temperature only 1.1 degree. That’s significant, but not dangerous. CERN, the world’s top particle physics laboratory, just found that our big, abrupt climate changes are produced by variations in the sun’s activity. That’s the same sun the modelers had dismissed as “unchanging.” CERN says the sun’s variations interact with cosmic rays to create more or fewer of earth’s heat-shielding clouds. The IPCC had long admitted it couldn’t model clouds--and now the CERN experiment says the clouds are the earth’s thermostats! In 2000, for example, the sun was strong, and few cosmic rays hit the earth. Therefore, skies were sunny, the earth warmed and crops grew abundantly. The Little Ice Age sun was far weaker and its heavy overcast clouds deflected more of the solar heat back into space. The earth went cold and the weather became highly unstable. Huge numbers of both humans and animals starved, due to extreme droughts, massive floods and untimely frosts. We haven’t seen the likes of that extreme weather in the past 150 years! The Old Masters paintings in the world’s museums are mute testimony to this cycling. The Medieval Warming’s paintings show mostly sunny skies. The Little Ice Age skies are shown as heavily overcast. London held ice fairs on the Thames—and once an elephant was led across on the river’s ice!
Henrick Svensmark, a Danish astrophysicist, proposed the cosmic ray-cloud connection in 2008, after ultraviolet light quickly produced huge numbers of tiny cloud seeds in his “cloud chamber.” The climate modelers dismissed Svensmark, saying his cloud seed particles were too small, and would just evaporate in the open air. Now, CERN has unraveled the earth’s cloud chemistry--and confirmed Svensmark’s theory--with their Large Hadron Collider producing the “cosmic rays.” CERN found that the climate modelers totally failed to understand the interaction of electrically charged cloud particles created by the cosmic rays, which produced one or two orders of magnitude more clouds. The ionized clouds also reflected more heat back into space—and lasted longer. CERN’s lead author, Ken Carslaw, said in the CERN Courier (December 2016) that all the projections of the climate models should thus be revised downward. But what about the Ice Age predictions of the 1970s, and the “parboiled planet” forecast by James Hansen in 1988? And why the “pause” over the past 20 years? Those events were produced by another, shorter, natural cycle that’s embroidered over the thousand-year Dansgaard-Oeschger cycle. The Pacific Oscillation is only 60 years long, but it fooled us—and supposedly NOAA—into thinking each of those 30-year segments was a new permanent trend. Our media were supposed to give us a longer perspective, but didn’t. CERN’s preliminary findings about the cloud/cosmic ray interaction were even published in the London Express in October of 2015. However, the rest of the world’s media ignored the story. They preferred scare headlines about polar bear extinction and New York City under water. ...

 Intelligentsia Elegy-2/5 City Journal, by E. M. Oblomov; American intellectuals are at odds with the workings of democracy. -- The Russian language boasts a formidable literary tradition. A handful of Russian words have made their way into English agitprop, apparatchik, commissar, gulag, Kalashnikov, nomenklatura, pogrom, samizdat, vodka, and now kompromat. But while the Russian language is expressive, it is mostly a borrower, not a lender, of words. The word intelligentsia made its first English appearance in 1918, shortly after the Russian Revolution. It exploded in usage thereafter. What was missing from the West’s conceptual inventory in 1918 that we had to import a foreign word from Revolutionary Russia? Intelligentsia, a very Russian concept, is difficult to pin down with precision. Russia has always been a caste society and the intelligentsia was a particular caste, consisting of educated people who did not fit into one of the traditional categories—clergy, nobility, peasants, merchants, or the urban middle class. But the line of demarcation for membership was never clear. ...
The United States was bound to be at odds with its intellectual class. Unlike Tsarist Russia, with its rigid system of castes and ranks, the United States was from the beginning an egalitarian republic, with no native intelligentsia. In the nineteenth century, Tocqueville found that, “there is no class . . . in America, in which the taste for intellectual pleasures is transmitted with hereditary fortune and leisure and by which the labors of the intellect are held in honor.” Tocqueville conceived of the intelligentsia in French terms and identified it with aristocracy. But Americans were doers, not navel-gazers. They lacked a “taste for intellectual pleasures” but possessed a huge appetite for acquiring practical knowledge. For more than a century after Tocqueville, intellectuals remained at the margins of American society. American elites were industrial and financial, and the nation’s rude and boisterous culture reflected their tastes and preferences. But change was inevitable. ...
The American intelligentsia remains hard to define. A good working definition may be a class of educated people who, like Lewis Carroll’s White Queen, are able to believe as many as six impossible things before breakfast. Here, in no particular order, is a full day’s worth: colleges are hotbeds of rape culture; Cuba has excellent health care; the New York Times has no partisan bias; Islamophobia is a meaningful word; poverty causes crime; poverty causes terrorism; global warming causes terrorism; gender is a social construct; capitalism causes racism; racism causes crime; racism causes poverty; Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia; and so on. At least in the Soviet case, complicity in a soul-crushing system of official lies was coerced at the point of a bayonet. It is disturbing that, with our intelligentsia, these beliefs are self-inflicted. The election of Barack Obama was the singular triumph of this class. His election was celebrated for the milestone in race relations that it represented. But among the intelligentsia, this ecstasy was heightened considerably because he was One Of Us. His imminent canonization as a secular saint is best understood in the context of the arrival of the intelligentsia at the apex of American political power. Obama was only the second professional intellectual to be elected president, the first being Woodrow Wilson. It is probably not a coincidence that these two presidents have been temperamentally our least democratic. ...


Tolstoy, Chekhov / Wikimedia Commons


Pray for Chekhov: Or, What Russian Literature Can Teach Conservatives. Gary Saul Morson at the Heritage Foundation

The Unheroic Heart-12/16 Washington FreeBeacon, Essay: Gary Saul Morson on why Russian literature matters today -- BY: Aaron MacLean -- Among the many quirks of the small college where I was an undergraduate was that it required all students to read, in the summer before senior year, War and Peace. Far from being a dull project, for me the novel was a source of hypnotic delights: The competing role models of the dark, heroic Andrei and his friend, the searching, kindly Pierre; the attractive figure of Natasha—what now most holds me back from rereading the thing is the fear that, in my adulthood, I can no longer be charmed by her—not to mention the spectacle of these weirdly real souls caught up in all that war, in Great Events.
Never mind that the closest I came to an act of bravery was getting up before 10 a.m. and managing not to trip over the empties on my way to class. I decided that Andrei—tall, tragic, and irresistible to the ladies—was my kind of guy. Like preferring Achilles to Odysseus, or James Bond to George Smiley, this was a lifestyle choice. I expect a lot of young men who read the novel have a similar reaction, though I don’t know how many had a professor like mine, who delicately pointed out how my preference revealed that I was completely missing Tolstoy’s point. The ambitious Andreis of the world are very often incapable of happiness, he told me. It’s the bumbling Pierres who, despite appearances, really live.
I relate this story not because my moral education is all that interesting, but to make the more general point that a novel—a great novel, at least—really can be a source for such an education. That’s a commonplace enough assertion in some circles, though not, sadly, in most college literature departments today.  At least it would be supported by Gary Saul Morson, who has somehow not only survived but flourished as a professor of Russian literature, first at the University of Pennsylvania and today at Northwestern, and who came to Washington this week to deliver a lecture at the Heritage Foundation called “Pray for Chekhov: Or, What Russian Literature Can Teach Conservatives.” (It was quite excellent, and you can watch it here.) Morson would go much further, in fact. Western intellectuals, in his view, increasingly resemble the pre-Revolutionary Russian intelligentsia. Considering the totalitarianism that resulted when these men and women finally took power, this is not a reassuring observation. Morson warns:
Let me lay my cards on the table. To the extent that a group of intellectuals comes to resemble an intelligentsia, to that extent is totalitarianism on the horizon—should that group gain power. That, not Swedish style social democracy, is what I see happening here. I foresee in years rather than decades first a Putin style managed democracy, and soon after a Stalinist state, or rather one beyond Stalinism since Stalin did not have access to today’s monitoring technology.
The old intelligentsia—united, like today, by faith in materialism, socialism, and the power of science to order human affairs—found its enemy in literature, and in particular in the great realist novelists. Morson quoted the critic Mikhail Gershenzon’s line that “The surest gauge of the greatness of a Russian writer is the extent of his hatred of the intelligentsia,” and indeed the novelists generally took a dim view of their politicized intellectual contemporaries. At least one, Dostoyevsky, himself once a member of the intelligentsia, accurately predicted the logic of the twentieth century’s coming totalitarianism—for example, in the reasoning of Crime and Punishment‘s Raskolnikov, who opportunistically shifts between utilitarianism and relativism to justify his crime. The real divide between the intelligentsia and the novelists was that the former were invested in all-encompassing ideologies of History and human action, while the latter, as documentarians of the complexity of man’s consciousness and the radical contingency of the actions of men in groups—of “history”—found ideology ridiculous. The novelists, through their very method, were “making a polemical point,” according to Morson. “The intelligensia denied that people were complex at all. Human complexity was an idea hindering radical action.” The realists stood in their way. This was literature that stood not so much in opposition to philosophy, but offered itself as a replacement to philosophy—or at least, to modern philosophy, and to the social sciences. It was humanizing, pluralistic, and implied that one’s politics ought to follow from a sense of modesty regarding what man can know, and of what he can achieve. It was, in this sense, conservative. Some of the realists—most prominently Tolstoy and Chekhov—also advanced an ethics that paired nicely with this politics: life was to be found in the unheroic moments between crises, and bourgeois concerns like treating your family well and paying your debts were tied to happiness. I am not sure that Morson is right that we are on the path to totalitarianism. As he himself points out, the Russian radicals of the nineteenth century were revolutionists. Our radicals, bless them, seem too invested in bourgeois concerns like tenure to follow their own project to its logical ends. But his eloquent case for literature, and in particular for the realists, is of great value. It also highlights an enduring problem for conservatives: How do you interest the young in the case for modesty and incrementalism? How do you warn them of the dangers of heroism? End
Editor: I too read the great Russian novelists in college, especially Tolstoy and Dostoevsky. I purposely left one last Dostoevsky book unread: "Notes from the Underground." I haven't read it to this day. I can always look forward to reading one more Dostoevsky book. So this article and lecture above is dear to my heart. I wish I could have taken this course at Boston Univ. I would have dropped Howard Zinn's (whom Matt Damon has an inordinate love for) course called "Law and Justice in America" for this one. But alas, I didn’t have that choice but was caught up in some of the intelligentsia's lies that Tolstoy and Dostoevsky warned about. No longer.

 

     
 


Around the World w/ Norman Rockwell on Pan Am